On Jul 26, 6:42=A0pm, Citizen Jimserac <Jimse...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jul 22, 5:30=A0pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 22, 12:49=A0pm, Ilena Rose <B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > From Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal:http://ilenarose.blogspot.com
>
> > > David Gorski is another S****-oil Vigilante Vaccination Propagandist
> > > ... great expose on his
perfidy.www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/S****-=
oil.htm#David-Gorski
>
> > >http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/05/david-gorski-md.html
>
> > > DAVID GORSKI, M.D.: THE WORLDWIDE WANKER OF "WOO"
>
> > > Gorskiorac_1By J.B. Handley
>
> > Ilena, I am, frankly, surprised at you. When you previously posted
>
> NO MARK, WE ARE SURPRISED AT >>> YOU <<<<!!!!
>
> You pur****t to be concerned about the health of people and, in
> particular children, on the matter of vaccines.
> And yet, when some horrible injury or death occurs,
> you PERSIST in defending losers such as this Gorski s***.
You are so pathetic that you do not have the right to lick his ass.
David Gorski is way mnore honorable than YOU or net-bully and cyber-
squatter J. Bully Handley.
> As everyone, including, I am certain, yourself, now knows,
> the most serious exposures of pharmaceutical industry money
> influencing research has been re****ted - the most recent being
> unacknowledged receipt of monies to Harvard medical professors who
> have a connection with research.
Which has nothing to do with David Gorski.
> Are we to believe that it is OK TO IGNORE THE DEATHS OF CHILDREN,
> BECAUSE S*** LIKE GORSKI CLAIM IT IS "RARE"??
No, because scientist who use facts prove it is rare. Much rarer than
the adverse effects of diseases that vaccines are designed to
prevent.
> Does that MAKE IT SOMEHOW OK??
No, and you are raising strawmen.
> You do see that THERE IS NO DEFENSE OF SUCH A POSITION
> AND therefore, spare yourself the bother of the usual innuendo and
> insults - you position and sup****t of this kind of system of
> "medicine" is indefensible.
Wrong. My position is FULLY DEFENSIBLE because it rests on facts and
truth, not inuendo and paranoia.
> Do you have the courage to admit it?
Do you have a brain to understand it?
As for courage, mine is well do***ented.
|
