On Jul 22, 5:48 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:f35ddaca-7a94-4a66-9d0a-a8eedcc9c2b9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 22, 12:45 pm, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A."
>
> <scie...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > fArt Sack wrote:
> > > Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote:
> > > > We've been through this...
>
> > > We have.
> > > You impersonated a ....
>
> > Nobody. Nice try, but all demonstrably wrong.
>
> Wrong Frager/fArtie. Demonstrably T R U E. However, since you never
> recognized truth before, I am not surprised you would lie about it
> now.
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Look who is posting about lies.
>
> Is this true, Mark S Probert, Merrick, NY?
>
> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
> From: "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-September 7, 2004" <M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t
> 09-07...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
> From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-July 10, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
> 07-10...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> From: M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 30, 2004
> (M.a.r.k_P.r.o.b.e.r.t_04-30...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
>
> Newsgroups: alt.sup****t.cerebral-palsy, misc.handicap
> From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 11, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
> 06-11...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:11:24 GMT
>
> http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html
>
> "I have never been an attorney, have never claimed to be one, and do not
> play one on the internet."
>
> Mark S. Probert of Merrick, NY
> Mar 11 2002, 7:37 pm
>
> " I do not have a little willie. My willie is big."
>
> Mark S. Probert of Merrick, NY
> Sun, Jun 4 2006 11:47 am
>
> Mark S. Probert has continued his internet assaults on me while claiming
> that he was never disbarred, never an attorney, and that I am crazy.
>
> He initially attacked me right afterStephen Barrett, Terry Polevoy, &
> Christopher Grell lost to me in a now classic SLAPP suit. Details here.
>
> He seems to believe that his constant attacks on me should go
unresponded=
to
> and any defense to his lies is "stalking."
>
> He claims he is my victim and has accused me of stalking his family.
>
> The fact is that he attempted to infiltrate my sup****t group disguised
as=
a
> female, called my home / office and threatened me.
>
> Interestingly, his teammate, Terry Polevoy, was also caught disguised as
=
a
> female on Usenet -- attacking me and others he is suing.
>
> I mistakenly waited for another few years before I contacted Probert's
wi=
fe
> (see letter below) ... though I realize now I should have contacted her
> immediately upon his constant intrusions into my life.
>
> I have never stalked him, though he repeats this libelous claim
practical=
ly
> daily.
>
> Probert now has Betty (Mrs. John) Wirsen repeating his lies for him,
> claiming that her research shows he was never disbarred.
>
> Their story is that there are two Mark S. Probert's, both formerly of
> Webster Ave. in Merrick, NY, both born in November, 1946, both married
t=
o a
> Sandra B. Probert.
>
> Merrick, NY has an approximate population of 22,000 people.
>
> Jeffrey P. Utz, who very briefly held a restricted medical license and
si=
nce
> then has claimed to be a pediatrician, claims there is absolutely no
> evidence that Probert was disbarred.
>
> Utz also claims there is no evidence that 'silicon implants ever harmed
> anyone.'
>
> Click here to see how ludicrous that is!
>
> So much for his credibility!
>
> I have a very full life and although I have not posted on Usenet for
seve=
ral
> months during which Probert continued to attack me.
>
> Utz and Wirsen and others from Barrett's Quackwatch team continue to
deny
> Probert's professional failures ... instead, they malign and libel me.
>
> Because of their actions, I am now posting the public records to prove
th=
at
> the Quackwatch propagandist, Mark S. Probert was indeed disbarred. On
> Usenet, Probert has admitted his birthday in November, 1946.
>
> He has oft spoken of his wife, Sandra B. Probert and his children and
tol=
d
> family 'stories' about them on Usenet publicly.
>
> #1 ... Evidence of Mark S. Probert residing on Webster Ave. in Merrick,
N=
Y.
> being disbarred.
>
> Name:
>
> MARKPROBERT
>
> Date Of Birth:
>
> 11/XX/1946
>
> Gender:
>
> MALE
>
> Address:
>
> 1698 WEBSTER AVE
>
> MERRICK, NY 11566
>
> County:
>
> NASSAU
>
> Phone:
>
> 516-968-5572
>
> NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION
>
> EMPLOYER INFORMATION
>
> Employer:
>
> MARK S PROBERT ESQ
>
> Organization:
>
> PERSON
>
> Agency Information Current Through:
>
> 05-25-2005
>
> Database Last Updated:
>
> 07-20-2005
>
> Update Frequency:
>
> ANNUAL
>
> Current Date:
>
> 11/26/2005
>
> Source:
>
> NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT
>
> Currency Status:
>
> ARCHIVE RECORD
>
> Licensing Agency:
>
> NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION
>
> License/Certification Type:
>
> ATTORNEY
>
> License Number:
>
> 1253889
>
> Issue Date:
>
> 00/00/1978
>
> License Status:
>
> DISBARRED
>
> License State:
>
> NY
>
> #2 ... Evidence of Mark S. and Sandra B. Probert residing on Webster
Ave.=
in
> Merrick, NY. taken from a separate court record at the same address as
t=
he
> disbarred Mark S. Probert
>
> Name:
>
> MARK S PROBERT
>
> 169 WEBSTER AVE
>
> MERRICK, NY 11566
>
> Attorney:
>
> PRO SE
>
> Name:
>
> SANDRA B PROBERT
>
> 169 WEBSTER AVE
>
> MERRICK, NY 11566
>
> Attorney:
>
> PRO SE
>
> Name:
>
> MARKPROBERT
>
> Date Of Birth:
>
> 11/XX/1946
>
> Gender:
>
> MALE
>
> Address:
>
> 1698 WEBSTER AVE (former address-not current)
>
> MERRICK, NY 11566
>
> County:
>
> NASSAU
>
> Phone:
>
> 516-
>
> To believe Probert and Wirsen and Utz and the others who continue to
clai=
m
> that the Mark S Probert from this group, The Rag-tag Posse was not
disbar=
red
> ... one would have to believe:
>
> 1 - there are 2 Mark S. Proberts who have lived at the same address on
> Webster Avenue in Merrick, NY
>
> 2 - Both are married to a Sandra B. Probert
>
> 3 - Both were born in November, 1946
>
> Interestingly enough, the same people who repeat Probert's denials, also
> believe other propaganda disseminated by the Quackwatch.com team.
>
> Update on 3.3.2005
>
> I removed this webpage after I first received an answer from Sandra
Probe=
rt
> last November.
>
> Now that she is posting our correspondence on Usenet with links to this
p=
age
> ... I am republi****ng it.
>
> Apparently she wants to re-open this topic to the Internet.
>
> She apparently is an owner of the Ilena Rosenthal Fan Club ... just one
o=
f
> several vehicles Mark's Leaders from the Quackbuster Sites are using to
> attempt to destroy my good name. For further information of the high
prof=
ile
> law suit Barrett lost to me ... and that is now in the Supreme Court of
> California for one comment I made on Terry Polevoy, click here.
>
> Her husband has been even more obnoxious than usual .... and I even
doubt
> that she herself is posting. However, if her husband is forging her
> signature, that they will have to work out together.
>
> Since last October, my gut feelings that Mark was involved with Terry
> Polevoy in his very frightening obsession of locating my whereabouts
have
> been confirmed. I actually have a copy of the Private Investigator's
Repo=
rt
> they hired to hunt me down and their admittance that they were lying
abou=
t
> the reason to stalk me in the postings to their Club.
>
> Mark was joined with them in a now removed Yahoo Group, SBIPrivateClub,
> which involvedseveral of Polevoy and Barrett's teammates in stalking me
a=
nd
> some friends of mine, and apparently illegally attempting to access my
ba=
nk
> accounts.
>
> Here is an explanation of who they are.
>
> Update on 3.3.2005
>
> I removed this webpage after I first received an answer from Sandra
Probe=
rt
> last November.
>
> Now that she is posting our correspondence on Usenet with links to this
p=
age
> ... I am republi****ng it.
>
> Apparently she wants to re-open this topic to the Internet.
>
> She apparently is an owner of the Ilena Rosenthal Fan Club ... just one
o=
f
> several vehicles Mark's Leaders from the Quackbuster Sites are using to
> attempt to destroy my good name. For further information of the high
prof=
ile
> law suit Barrett lost to me ... and that is now in the Supreme Court of
> California for one comment I made on Terry Polevoy, click here.
>
> Her husband has been even more obnoxious than usual .... and I even
doubt
> that she herself is posting. However, if her husband is forging her
> signature, that they will have to work out together.
>
> http://www.nylawfund.org/pubs/97AnRep.pdf
>
> page 33
>
> Mark S Probert Judicial District 10 Awards 6 Amount 2,900
>
>
>
> >Search Results << Search Again People Search
> >Search criteria: MARK PROBERT in NY 11 Matches Found (100 max.)
> > Full Name Address City State Age Birth Date Phone
> >1. PROBERT, MARK S Available BROOKLYN NY 54 Available Available
> >View Details
> >2. PROBERT, MARK S Available BROOKLYN NY 54 Available Available
> >View Details
> >3. PROBERT, MARK S Available MERRICK NY 57 Available View
> >Details
> >4. PROBERT, MARK S Available MERRICK NY 57 Available Available
> >View Details
> >5. PROBERT, MARK S Available MERRICK NY 57 Available Available
> >View Details
> >6. PROBERT, MARK S Available MERRICK NY 57 Available View
> >Details
> >7. PROBERT, MARK S Available MERRICK NY 57 Available View
> >Details
> >8. PROBERT, MARK S Available MERRICK NY 57 Available View
> >Details
> >9. PROBERT, MARK S Available MERRICK NY 57 Available Available
> >View Details
> >10. PROBERT, MARK S Available MERRICK NY 57 Available View
> >Details
> >11. PROBERT, MARK B Available MERRICK NY Available View Details
> >EAT **** AND DIE ILENA....READ AND WEEP....CRAWL AWAY NOW!!!!!
> > JOYCE
>
> LOL ... you can tell LIAR Martha Murdock that is NOT going to happen
> and how beautifully you represent NSIF here.
I love it, Proby exposed again. It is so sad that Proby has now
officially lost his mind, although I always had a sneaky feeling it
would happen. All his nonsense about forged this or that, when he
knows darn well it was only the stuff that he stirred up. But in his
paranoid deluded mind, he can no longer tell the between what is real
and what is not
But the wonderful thing about this whole episode is that Jan is acting
in the true tradition of a real American Patriot, right up there with
George Wa****ngton and FDR in exposing Proby's antics. But Jan does it
with the real do***ents, not some contrived mumbo-jumbo, which is
Proby's specialty. Keep divulging the facts about Proby; you just got
to love it. Poor Proby, not even his Cult will back him up. ****o =96
gone, Manson =96 gone, Wright =96 hiatus, etc. etc.etc. Even Spam Bunny
is distancing herself from him. It is sad for Proby, but I did
predict this would happen that everybody in his cult would abandon
him, and they have!!!
Please leave these groups Proby, Jan, Ilena and I have them under
control. Rest assured that only do***entable evidence will be posted
as we always have done and will always continue to do. Good luck
seeking professional help. I suggest the nearest nut house, if
they'll take you!!
|
