Re: Pediatric bipolar disorder: An object of study in the creation of an illness
by Peter Parry <peter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jul 20, 2008 at 07:53 PM
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:57:14 -0400, "Jan Drew"
<jdrew1374@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Dr. Healy's credentials were impeccable, and therefore he was permitted
to
>testify. ...
I don't doubt for one minute that they are. However if anyone with
similar credentials were to be quoted on, say, the subject of vaccine
safety John would be jumping up and down and writing "pharma ****ll"
or similar. I'm just puzzled how someone who (quite properly) works
for many drug companies can be a "noted expert" (if they sup****t
John's viewpoint) but a "pharma ****ll" (if they don't). This doesn't
seem to be a very consistent approach to debate.
