Re: Study links vaccine to autism

On Jun 26, 12:15=A0am, Citizen Jimserac <Jimse...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 6:21 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 25, 4:17 pm, Citizen Jimserac <Jimse...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 25, 8:33 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > PROBEPOSTEROUS!!!!!!
>
> > > Are YOU, Proby-woby, the one who told me
> > > that ALL the Mercury was gone from the
> > > vaccines??
>
> > No, asshole, I never claimed that. How do I know that I never claimed
> > it? Because it is UNTRUE.
>
> I checked an earlier post of yours and
> SURPRISE! =A0it seems you were right !!!

AS USUAL.

>
> Score: Proby -232

In addition to being illiterate and illogical, you are innumerate.

> > You see, idiot-fool, I do read the CDC website with an open mind, and
> > have read the vaccine tables listing the thimerosal content of
> > vaccines. I also read a lot of other things such as:
>
> >http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/grabit/acip-min-feb.pdf
>
> > which was a survey to see just how many pediatrician offices were
> > still using thimerosal containing vaccines. Note the reference to the
> > pharmaceutical companies exchange program. Do I have to explain that
> > for your very limited intellect?
>
> Wow! =A0Multisyllabic words AND a coherent sentence!
> You've made two rational and intelligent comments in a row!!!
>
> (ASIDE...)HEY EVERYONE! I'VE FINALLY FIGURED OUT HOW
> TO COMMUNICATE WITH PROBY, YOU HAVE TO INSULT THE
> GUY EVERY OTHER SENTENCE AND THEN HE STARTS
> COMMUNICATING HALFWAYS RATIONALLY!!!!
>
> Ok nitwit let's resume...

However, dipwad, you did not understand what I wrote nor did you read
the link I provided.

> > Do read the entie 60+ pages, as I did. If that is too much for you,
> > the specific information is on a page where the numerals add up to 12.
>
>
>http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/109867588/abstract?CRETRY=3D.=
...
>
> > which is not direct proof that thimerosal containing vaccines were all
> > gone at a specific date, but does show just how fast a lot of vaccines
> > are used.
>
> OH!!! It's not direct proof is it??? =A0The question is,
> how would a gullible moron like yourself know one way
> or the other??

Simply because I am way smarter than you, and my reading comprehension
and logic skills are far superior to yours. Thanks for asking.

> > =A0Well it seems you were RIGHT...
>
> > > er, EXCEPT THAT IS FOR THE FLU VACCINES!
> > > (perhaps others too?)
>
> > No, idiot. Even the flu vaccine comes in a thimerosal free version.
>
> Tell it to Peter Bowsprit, he just his flu shots
> and forgot to ask for the thiMESSrosal free version.
> He's suffering from the delusion that there was
> no thimess in it (aside... if there wasn't, one wonders
> what WAS in it, heh heh, with the vaccine manufacturers
> you never know until AFTER you've gotten the shots!!)

He said he had the thimerosal free version. That is also do***ented on
the CDC website.

Do try to read for comprehension.

> > > Read this, old Probe, and weep:
> > > from Deirdre Imus article
at:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deirdre-im=
us/a-timely-truth-untold-aga_...
>
> > Diedre Imus? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
> > You probably think that Jenny McCarthy is not a boob, either.
>
> I think she's got more guts than you for standing
> up to the vaccine manufacturers instead of gullibly
> accepting everything they say like a moron (=3DYOU!).

Actually, it is not her guts that got her where she is today. She uses
those siliCONES well.

> > > "The article also inaccurately re****ts that thimerosal-containing
> > > vaccines were "replaced" with thimerosal-free formulas in 2001.
> > > Thimerosal-containing vaccines were not recalled as the article
> > > suggests
>
> > The vaccine makers offered free swapping services instead.
>
> INDEED, SO IF PEOPLE DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT IT, THEY
> WOULDN'T =A0BE BOTHERED. HOW COR****ATE OF THEM!!

Doctors were notifed. They had a choice. People do bear some degree of
responsibility for learning about their health. Of course, if they are
all as dumb as you, it would not make a difference.

> > > and remained on clinic shelves well into 2003, according to
> > > government communications.
>
> > Which Diedre has never made public. Imagine that. Joe McCarthy.
>
> WHICH THE VACCINE MAKERS NEVER MADE PUBLIC, IMAGINE THAT
> CHARLIE McCARTHY!!!!

No, dippy, not possible. Diedre is making a claim which she obviously
read something (if it exists) and she is not providing proof of
existence.

> >> In addition, the majority of flu shots,
> > > given to pregnant women and babies as young as six months, still
> > > contain 25 micrograms of thimerosal."
>
> > Wow. And the 25 mcg immediately dilute upon injection. Oh, wait, you
> > believe that thimerosal has a homeopathetic effect BECAUSE of the
> > dilution.
>
> Oh it "DILUTES" does it?

Surely does. How doyou think it is trans****ted around the body? By
moped?

> > > THE MAJORITY OF FLU SHOTS STILL CONTAIN 25 MICROGRAMS
> > > OF THIMEROSAL? =A0Why Probe, a little forgetfullness there in your
> > > analysis eh?
>
> > Not at all. I never claimed otherwise. Idiot.
>
> Ah then you feel its ALL OK AFTER ALL, EH?

Since there is no reason to be concerned with thimerosal, yes.

> > > And while YOU can't seem to get some verification
> > > on Homeopathy,
>
> > No, dipwad, YOU won't provide proof of the basics beliefs of
> > homeoquackery.
>
> OH POOR PROBY NEEDS CITIZEN JIMSERAC to provide proof for
> him. =A0

I do not *need* you to do it. I challenged you to prove those points,
and you ducked and did the ostrich.

TSK TSK TSK, I understand, you're incapable of thinking
> for yourself. =A0Perhaps its the Mercury in all the vaccines
> you've had, eh???

No, stupid. It is the homeopathic brain you have. Totally diluted.

> > women AND BABIES are STILL getting
> > > the thimerosal?!!!!!
>
> > So what? There is NO proof that thimerosal is harmful.
>
> Oh! =A0THERE'S THAT PROOF WORD AGAIN - Since you don't think
> for yourself, maybe you just let the vaccine companies
> do your thinking for you, eh Charlie?

Wrong. It is YOU who are afraid of P R O O F. You probably do not know
what it means.

> Exactly how much Mercury is in the the thiMESSersol?
> Shall we call it 50%.

By percentage of molecular weight. If you were awake during high
school chemistry, you would be able to understand that this is
meangless. There is only 1 atom of Hg. Just one.

> Are you SURE you want to continue to assert that
> there is ... NO ... proof that the thimessersal is harmful?

Yes, I will. Since YOU have yet to provide an iota of proof that it
is.

> > > Perhaps this should be PROBED, EH?
> > > Yet another example of the inaccuracy, fallacy
>
> =A0> and doubletalk from Big Brother Probee.
>
> I just have to ask you one more time, Probee,
> WHAT IS THE PROBE-BA-BILITY that the thimessersal
> is harmless?

Near 100% from everything I have read. Facts, not idle conjecture or
the lies of the merchants of disease, disability and death.