Re: 'Trace' mercury

In message <VeKdnYUs-PQCzdHVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Peter Moran
wrote:

> What about fish, such as tuna, that 
> can contain over 1000 parts per billion (see 
> http://www.fda.gov/fdac/reprints/mercury.html
) as highly toxic methyl 
> mercury,  and are consumed in much larger volumes and much more
frequently?

I believe that the top antivax theologians have been working
hard on this problem and have come up with some answers.

First, they have deduced from the vastly greater toxicity
of vaccines relative to fish that ethyl mercury is much
more toxic than methyl mercury.

Second is the ability of the human nervous system (alone
in the animal kingdom) to selectively take up ethyl mercury
directly to the brain so that all of it goes there instead
of to other tissues.

Third is the human brain's ability to sequester ethyl
mercury where only chelation therapy and Lupron can
tease it out.

Research on these topics continues, and when enough monkeys
have been killed there are sure to be some which can be
used to prove other im****tant claims.

-- 
| "Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against |
|  unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct   |
|  before reason can act on them" -- Thomas Jefferson    |
+-------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------+