Re: Infant flat skulls can be avoided: U.S. doctors

"Roger Schlafly" <rogersc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:EDXOa.281$AB7.55775338@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Tsu Dho Nimh" <tsudhonimh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> > >Yes. Plus delayed development, less sound sleep, less sleep for
> > >the moms, etc. The BS campaign was a bad idea.
> >
> > Can you show evidence of the supposed delays in development, and
> > less sound sleep?
>
> Try this:
>
> The pattern of early motor development is affected by sleep position.
> (Stomach sleepers) attain several motor milestones earlier than (back
> sleepers).
> http://www.kids-md.com/Tipsheets/21_may2301/crawling.html

OK - they walk a little later. That is not quite the same thing as any
meaningful delay. As we have pointed out before - the kid who were born as
the campaign took effect are now 9. Do you have any evidence of long term
motor or cognitive defects?

The sleep problems are rare and those parents do have a legitimate choice.
Still not a common problem.

Your whole argument is sound and fury signifying nothing.

--
CBI, MD