Re: The troll Emerson Wainwright rants some more (Re: 81 times, No One ....)

> "Death" <Death@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
>> > "Death" <Death@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>> >
>> >> "No One" <noone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The key  paragraph is:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >        The panel said: "Islington Council rightly considered
the
>> >> >> >        im****tance of the right of the gay community not to be
>> >> >> >        discriminated against but did not consider the right of 
>> >> >> > Miss
>> >> >> >        Ladele as a member of a religious group.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I.e., the panel sup****ted the rights of same-*** couples to 
>> >> >> > marry.
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >> I replied with:
>> >>
>> >> >> Wrong ****wad, the panel said they ****ed up and did deny the
woman
>> >> >> her rights to not marry filthy faggots due to her religious 
>> >> >> beliefs.
>> >> >
>> >> > Foul-mouthed idiot. Even funnier, the paragraph I mentioned was in
>> >> > your original post, so you are now essentially arguing with
yourself
>> >> > and losing.  You might want to read the material you cut and paste
>> >> > before quoting it.
>> >>
>> >> That whine won't play here madam.
>> >
>> > That wasn't a "whine" but a satement of fact.  You are a foul-mouthed
>> > idiot and the paragraph I mentioned agreed with what I stated.
>> >
>> >> From what you called the key paragraph, and I'll paraphrase from
your
>> >> quote:
>> >> ...but did not consider the right of Miss Ladele as a member of a
>> >> religious
>> >> group.
>> >> Grow up *****-boi, and learn to read for comprehension