I've previously described how HIV, the gay disease, was given to
blacks in Africa as an attempt to show that HIVAIDS can affect anyone.
I briefly outlined HIV's history in Usenet article
<203.1206364285.20080324@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, see
<http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.aids/msg/c4c0dacd036ac32a>.
To recap: in the early 1980s gays had their own disease which was
probably caused by their lifestyle. To obtain research funding and
medical care for it they had to con the world into believing that
hetero***uals could get the disease too Unfortunately the gay disease
didn't affect white hetero***uals. So, the gay disease was given to
Africa: there was plenty of illness there already, and most Africans
claimed to be hetero***ual.
White hetero***uals pumped billions of dollars into the HIV problem.
Everyone knew that HIV had spread from gay men in the US to black
hetero***uals in Africa, and it was only a matter of time before the
pandemic affected other groups... affected everyone.
Twenty five years later the gay disease is now the gay and black
disease and has failed to move outside those target groups; the HIV
pandemic affects a tiny number of people.
Those who have been funding HIV, hoping they can buy immunity from it,
are now beginning to ask what they've been paying for and where all
that money is going.
<http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-news/aids-claim-sparks-backlash-for-who-847476.html>:
----- Begin Quote -----
The World Health Organisation was struggling yesterday to control the
global backlash from an admission by one of its most senior directors
that the threat of a generalised hetero***ual epidemic of Aids outside
Africa may be over.
The WHO has been under siege since Kevin de Cock, head of its HIV/Aids
department, told The Independent on Sunday that, outside sub-Saharan
Africa, the disease was recognised to be largely limited to high-risk
groups, such as injecting drug users.
----- End Quote -----
--
<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
4,902 days and counting...
|
