Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Health > Infertility Alternatives > Interesting art...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 10 Topic 395 of 477
Post > Topic >>

Interesting article on race at NY Times

by "-L." <gentleboa@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 16, 2005 at 01:15 AM

Since so many of us have transracially adopted, I thought I would post
the story, below.

Incidently,  National Geographic is funding a project to trace ancestry
through DNA (The Genographic project) although the kit which allows you
to participate is $99.00:
https://www5.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/
A little too spendy for me, to find out what I already know I am: A
mutt. ;)

-L.


***Paste***
" Why Race Isn't as 'Black' and 'White' as We Think

By BRENT STAPLES
Published: October 31, 2005

 People have occasionally asked me how a black person came by a "white"
name like Brent Staples. One letter writer ridiculed it as "an
anchorman's name" and accused me of making it up. For the record, it's
a
British name - and the one my parents gave me. "Staples" probably
arrived in my family's ancestral home in Virginia four centuries ago
with the British settlers.

 The earliest person with that name we've found - Richard Staples - was
hacked to death by Powhatan Indians not far from Jamestown in 1622. The
name moved into the 18th century with Virginians like John Staples, a
white surveyor who worked in Thomas Jefferson's home county, Albemarle,
not far from the area where my family was enslaved.

 The black John Staples who married my paternal great-great-grandmother
just after Emancipation - and became the stepfather of her children -
could easily have been a Staples family slave. The transplanted Britons
who had owned both sides of my family had given us more than a
preference for British names. They had also given us their DNA. In what
was an almost everyday occurrence at the time, my
great-great-grandmothers on both sides gave birth to children fathered
by white slave masters.

 I've known all this for a long time, and was not surprised by the
results of a genetic screening performed by DNAPrint Genomics, a
company
that traces ancestral origins to far-flung parts of the globe. A little
more than half of my genetic material came from sub-Saharan Africa -
common for people who regard themselves as black - with slightly more
than a quarter from Europe.

 The result that knocked me off my chair showed that one-fifth of my
ancestry is Asian. ****ing over the charts and statistics, I said out
loud, "This has got to be a mistake."

That's a common response among people who are tested. Ostensibly white
people who always thought of themselves as 100 percent European find
they have substantial African ancestry. People who regard themselves as
black sometimes discover that the African ancestry is a minority
****tion
of their DNA.

 These results are forcing people to re-examine the arbitrary
calculations our culture uses to decide who is "white" and who is
"black."

 As with many things racial, this story begins in the slave-era South,
where *** among slaves, masters and mistresses got started as soon as
the first slave ****p sailed into Jamestown Harbor in 1619. By the time
of the American Revolution, there was a visible class of light-skinned
black people who no longer looked or sounded African. Free mulattos,
emancipated by guilt-ridden fathers, may have accounted for up to
three-quarters of the tiny free-black population before the Revolution.

By the eve of the Civil War, the swarming numbers of mixed-race slaves
on Southern plantations had become a source of constant anguish to
planters' wives, who knew quite well where those racially ambiguous
children were coming from.

 Faced with widespread fear that racial distinctions were losing
significance, the South decided to define the problem away. People with
any ascertainable black ancestry at all were defined as black under the
law and stripped of basic rights. The "one drop" laws defined as black
even people who were blond and blue-eyed and appeared white.

Black people snickered among themselves and worked to subvert
segregation at every turn. Thanks to white ancestry spread throughout
the black community, nearly every family knew of someone born black who
successfully passed as white to get access to jobs, housing and public
accommodations that were reserved for white people only. Black people
who were not quite light enough to slip undetected into white society
billed themselves as Greek, Spanish, ****tuguese, Italian, South Asian,
Native American - you name it. These defectors often married into
ostensibly white families at a time when interracial marriage was
either
illegal or socially stigmatized.

 Those of us who grew up in the 1950's and 60's read black-owned
magazines and newspapers that praised the racial defectors as pioneers
while mocking white society for failing to detect them. A comic
newspaper column by the poet Langston Hughes - titled "Why Not Fool Our
White Folks?" - typified the black community's sense of smugness about
knowing the real racial score. In keeping with this history, many black
people I know find it funny when supposedly white Americans profess
shock at the emergence of blackness in the family tree. But genetic
testing holds plenty of surprises for black folks, too.

 Which brings me back to my Asian ancestry. It comes as a surprise,
given that my family's oral histories contain not a single person who
is
described as Asian. More testing on other family members should clarify
the issue, but for now, I can only guess. This ancestry could well have
come through a 19th-century ancestor who was incorrectly described as
Indian, often a catchall category at the time.

 The test results underscore what anthropologists have said for eons:
racial distinctions as applied in this country are social categories
and
not scientific concepts. In addition, those categories draw hard, sharp
distinctions among groups of people who are more alike than they are
different. The ultimate point is that none of us really know who we
are,
ancestrally speaking. All we ever really know is what our parents and
grandparents have told us. "
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Interesting article on race at NY Times
"-L." <gentl  2005-11-16 01:15:24 
Re: Interesting article on race at NY Times
"IFerToo" <I  2005-11-16 17:34:10 
Re: Interesting article on race at NY Times
"-L." <gentl  2005-11-16 17:39:13 
Re: Interesting article on race at NY Times
"-L." <gentl  2005-11-16 17:40:44 
Re: Interesting article on race at NY Times
"Snittens" <  2005-11-16 21:47:16 
Re: Interesting article on race at NY Times
"-L." <gentl  2005-11-16 22:00:57 
Re: Interesting article on race at NY Times
"Kris-Anne" <  2005-11-17 13:19:10 
Re: Interesting article on race at NY Times
"-L." <gentl  2005-11-18 01:43:15 
Re: Interesting article on race at NY Times
"Kris-Anne" <  2005-11-18 05:27:01 
Re: Interesting article on race at NY Times
"Kris-Anne" <  2005-12-05 07:47:20 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 6:01:36 CST 2008.