On Nov 13, 10:11=A0pm, rpautrey2 <rpautr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Nov 13, 4:56=A0am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 12, 8:47=A0pm, rpautrey2 <rpautr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 12, 6:25=A0pm, marcia <marcia1234...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > Paul was top-posting in a relevant part of the thread. Tell him
he'=
s
> > > > bad and give him a penalty.
>
> > > > This is not a diversion. Had this been an actual diversion you
woul=
d
> > > > have been instructed where to tune in your area. Again, this is
not=
a
> > > > diversion.
>
> > > Marcia,
> > > I'll give bottom posting a try
> > > but I can't promise that I'll
> > > keep it up. It might take a
> > > few days to get it right and
> > > then I might not like it.
> > > I'm a nonconformist!
>
> > > Paul
>
> > If you sit on your head while posting, it looks like you are stil top
> > posting, and you will not suffer withdrawal symptoms.
>
> > Some people, those concerned with diversion, etc. tried it, and found
> > that they were sitting on their heads all along.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> MP,
> Brillant!
> I don't see how anybody can take you serious about anything.
> I think your an idiot and a cyberpunk!
Cannot be. There is no evidence that you think.
BTW, it is *you're*, a contraction.
|
