www.preventdisease.com
Is Modern Medicine
Based On Faulty Theories?
Modern medicine is firmly founded on the =93Germ Theory of Disease=94
promulgated by Louis Pasteur in the 1860=92s. Pasteur=92s 140-year-old
theory is still the medical paradigm upon which Western medicine
fights disease as we enter the 21st century.
But with a huge increase today in infectious diseases and the rapidly
rising epidemic of cancer, diabetes, heart disease and other chronic
illnesses; we have to wonder if Pasteur=92s theory is really that sound.
After all, thousands of people die around the world every single week
from properly prescribed medicine in properly prescribed doses. This
is a serious indictment of pharmaceutical medicine which is
inextricably based on Pasteur=92s germ theory.
According to Pasteur:
=B7 Germs, or microbes, cause disease
=B7 Germs invade the body from the outside, i.e., air, water, or food
=B7 Human blood is sterile and can only be infected by outside microbes
=B7 Germs are monomorphic, i.e., they have only one form and can be
identified by species
=B7 Specific diseases are caused by specific germs
=B7 Germs should be killed by pharmaceutical drugs
In the 1870s Pasteur=92s germ theory was developed further by William
Koch, a contem****ary and rival of Pasteur, whose proofs of the germ
theory are still known today as =93Koch=92s Postulates=94. See Koch=92s
Postulates at (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch's_postulates)
Basically, Koch=92s contribution to the germ theory was to prove that a
specific type of germ caused a specific disease, that the germ would
be found in all people suffering from that particular disease but not
healthy people, and that every person exposed to these germs would
fall ill with disease.
However, Koch had to abandon part of his first postulate when he
discovered that healthy people could carry the germs of certain
diseases and yet show no symptoms. He also had to revise his third
postulate when it was shown that some people could be exposed to
virulent germs yet not catch the disease.
The =93proofs=94 of the new Germ Theory were already showing flaws.
Still, despite being highly controversial in the late 1800s, the Germ
Theory was quickly adopted by the medical powers of the day. This new
theory about germs invading from outside the body empowered the
medical and pharmaceutical industry as guardians of human and animal
health. People became dependent on the fledgling medical/drugs
industry for information and protection from disease. Thus, Modern
Medicine was born.
A number of eminent scientists opposed Pasteur and The Germ Theory,
most notably the highly respected Professor Antoine B=E9champ. B=E9champ
was a reserved, modest man and a much more distinguished scientist
than the self-promoting chemist, Louis Pasteur. (It is believed today
that Pasteur stole much of B=E9champ=92s work and passed it off as his
own. This prompted R.B. Pearson to write a book in the 1940s called
=93Pasteur, Plagiarist, Imposter.=94) See text at
(http://www.whale.to/a/b/
pearson.html)
B=E9champ and other scientists believed in the theory of pleomorphism,
that a microbe could evolve through many forms from virus to bacterium
to yeast to fungus to mold and could even de-evolve back to a pre-
virus again. B=E9champ could see this evolution and de-evolution clearly
in his microscope. Big Medicine rejected pleomorphism back then just
as it will not even look at pleomorphic phenomena filmed and
do***ented by scientists today, such as Dr. Robert O. Young in San
Diego, California.
Another of B=E9champ=92s contem****aries, Claude Bernard, expounded on the
pleomorphic theory and said that the inner terrain or =93milieu
interieur=94 was the cause of disease, and not microbes. It was
discovered that acidic blood and tissue provide a terrain that is
ideal for disease to develop. When the terrain becomes acidic,
microbes evolve into pathogenic forms and carry out the work nature
designed them to do =96 as cleaners and undertakers, scavenging inflamed
or infected tissue.
The acidity or acid/alkaline balance of the blood is measured by pH,
the potential of Hydrogen, see (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PH)
and
is a very im****tant marker for good health. The blood will do all it
can to keep its pH at 7.365, or slightly alkaline. It will even strip
alkaline reserves like calcium from the bones to buffer a rise in
acidity. (This can lead to a condition labelled by modern medicine as
osteo****osis.)
When the pH drops, even by .1, the increase in acidity is interpreted
by the microbes, already present in the body in their billions, as a
sign of a dead or dying body. This prompts them to morph from benign
bacteria into virulent yeast and mold so that they can reduce the body
to the dust from whence it came.
Even Pasteur eventually realized the truth of this and on his death-
bed said that =93Bernard was right... the microbe is nothing; the
terrain is everything.=94 But Big Medicine now chose to ignore him. They
sensed that the germ theory provided a gilt-edged op****tunity to amass
a huge fortune.
B=E9champ and others in the scientific community opposed the germ theory
and advocated the theory of pleomorphism, saying:
=B7 Acidic terrain, not germs, cause disease
=B7 Germs are already in the body by the billions and don=92t necessarily
have to come from without (although that can sometimes happen)
=B7 Blood is not sterile but can contain many microbial forms
=B7 Germs are pleomorphic, i.e., they can change through many forms (Dr
Gaston Naessens identified a microbe undergoing 16 different stages of
evolution)
=B7 Virtually all diseases are caused by acidic terrain
=B7 Diseases can be prevented or reversed by increasing the alkalinity
of the terrain
What led Professor B=E9champ to formulate his pleomorphic theory was the
discovery of great numbers of small grainy objects in live blood
samples which he observed through his microscope. Many of his
contem****aries dismissed these tiny life forms as laboratory
contamination which were of no im****tance. But they intrigued B=E9champ.
He named them =93microzymas=94 or =93little bodies=94.
He found microzymas present in every cell in the bloodstream, in
animals, in plants, and even in rocks. He found them present in the
remains of dead animals many years after the animal=92s body had
withered away to dust. He observed that in a healthy organism,
microzymas work at repairing and nouri****ng all cells; but when the
terrain becomes acidic, the microzymas morph into viruses, bacteria,
yeast, fungus, and mold and prepare to break the host down.
B=E9champ=92s work was ignored, ridiculed, suppressed, and soon forgotten.
Down through the years, some scientists discovered pleomorphic
phenomena for themselves - Enderlein, Rife, Reich, Livingston-Wheeler,
Naessens, and more recently, in the U.S., Dr. Robert O. Young (San
Diego) and Dr. David Jubb (New York). Most had no recourse to the
works of earlier scientists and thought that their discoveries were
unique to them. Like B=E9champ before them, they too found their
discoveries ignored or suppressed.
All of them were fascinated with the =93little bodies=94 that B=E9champ
had
called =93microzymas=94. Enderlein called them =93protits=94, Livingston-
Wheeler called them =93Progenitor cryptocides=94, and Naessens called them
=93somatids=94. But all found that they couldn=92t destroy these =93little
bodies=94 even when subjecting them to excessive carbonizing
temperatures or high dosage radiation.
Dr. David Jubb calls them =93Colloids of Life=94 and says that they are
indestructible. They resist =93enormous heat, radiation, and chemicals
and can reside in petrochemical solution, in hot rock deep within the
Earth, in meteorites and in radioactive water inside nuclear power
stations. Upon the loss of life of its host, colloid of life return to
the earth. A colloid of life is the unknown factor between the animate
and the inanimate.=94 (Jubbs Cell Rejuvenation, p.14.)
That last sentence has quite a resonance. Dr. Jubb is saying that
colloids of life, or microzymas, are the smallest observable life
forms between spirit and matter.
We still have a lot to learn about life, medicine, and healing but we
need to approach these things with an open, inquisitive mind.
How long will it take modern medicine to accept that germs don=92t cause
disease but only appear as a result of disease? Who will fund research
into the pleomorphic work begun by B=E9champ, Enderlein, Rife and
others? Who is brave enough to confront Big Pharma=92s doctrinaire,
Pasteurian approach to drug based medicine?
When a group of people are exposed to a virus or food toxin, modern
medicine examines only those who get sick. What they should do is
examine those who didn=92t get sick. One would no doubt find that the
sick people had acidic blood and tissue while those who didn=92t suc***b
to the virus/toxin were alkaline. Therein lies the key to health.
Disease cannot take hold in an alkaline body. An alkalising diet and
way of living can prevent and reverse disease. But don=92t expect this
to be endorsed by orthodox medicine =96 there=92s no profit in it.
More articles on Acid/Alkaline Balance
Reference Source 136
December 7, 2007
URL: http://preventdisease.com/news/articles/120707_faulty_thoery.shtml
|
