TC wrote:
>
> Any adverse effects ascribed to any of the oil soluble vitamins
> were found only when using the refined and highly processed single
> vitamins. NOT VITAMINS FROM FOOD SOURCES like fish liver oil.
You have evidence for this? Like a study?
Or are you making an unsup****ted assertion
in the hopes nobody will shoot it down?
> You are not being accurate when you say that these vitamins have
> adverse effects at higher levels of intake when they are gotten
> from fish liver oils.
What about the Norwegian study? Those people
were getting vitamin A from fish oils?
As a child, I lived in Denmark, and I remember
that in school at lunch time one of the teachers
would come around and put a few drops of cod liver
oil on our sandwiches.
> Only the highly processed single vitamin vitamins caused the
> adverse effects. Vitamins gotten from whole food sources like
> cod liver can be ingested in very large amounts without adverse
> effects.
How is that possible? The fish oil contains
the same molecules used in the pure vitamin A
studies. If you're suggesting that fish oil
contains a protective factor, what is it?
It isn't vitamin D.
> Please stop confusing the issues with your lack of knowledge
> of the topic. You are perptuating a FRAUD.
And your evidence is? A clinical study which
shows no harm from a level of fish oil intake
that should cause harm (based on the pure
vitamin A studies) will do nicely. Got one?
