On Apr 20, 4:43=A0pm, Theo <maur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Garry Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:08:25 +0200, Theo wrote:
>
> > <snip>
>
> >> =A0reki is not a magic word : Reki save me .!!" and =A0u r
> >>saved ...
>
> > True, but actually *doing* reiki can give miraculous results. If one
> > gives oneself reiki, one will find that the introspection or whatever
> > needs to be done will suddenly start taking place. But the first step
is=
> > actually *doing* the reiki. As you say, reiki is not a magic word, it
is=
> > the name of a group of healing techniques, and like all techniques, in
> > order to work, they have to be used.
>
> =A0 It was understated that Reiki practice and Hatsurei ho
> were =A0implied
> =A0 is not =A0buzzing a wand at four corners and holding the
> other hand =A0each cormer's element that helps
> =A0 but many people think the same with =A0symbols or naming
> Reiki =A0alone!
>
> =A0 u do not feel that? I do
Oddly, in a Reiki book I recently purchased, the author states that
many of the Reiki "masters" he met thought that Reiki was only a
spiritual discipline, that it had nothing to do with actual healing.
The author is Japanese, so perhaps things are even screwier in Japan
than they are here.
I can't imagine people thinking that simply saying the word Reiki or
the names of the symbols is enough to actually do Reiki. In order to
think this way, they must have had really poor teachers, or their
teachers must have had really poor teachers, etc. It's hard to
imagine Reiki surviving without teaching what it is that you actually
*do* when doing Reiki.
Love and Light,
Garry
|
